As the realm of AI continues to expand, a pertinent question arises: Can AI-generated works themselves be patentable? In the United Kingdom, the Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 introduces a legal framework for computer-generated works, defining the author as "the person who arranges the creation of a work," presupposing that humans play a role in the creative process.
Varied Judicial Approaches
In certain countries, including China and potentially England, existing judicial approaches present two perspectives on ownership of AI-generated works: the software developer and the software user. The debate revolves around defining the rightful owner of works brought into existence by AI.
AI and Patent Law: A Human Endeavour
In the current landscape of patent law, AI cannot be acknowledged as an inventor, given that "devising" an invention is considered a human activity involving creative input. Consequently, any patent granted over an AI-generated invention belongs to the human deviser or, if an employee, their employer.
Interestingly, the High Court of England and Wales clarified that under existing UK patent law, an AI machine cannot be listed as an inventor. However, it acknowledged the possibility of listing the owner of an AI-generated invention as both the inventor and owner of that invention, adding a nuanced layer to the evolving discourse on AI and patentability.
Legal Precedents and Ongoing Cases
Recent examples, such as The Museum of Modern Art in New York hosting an AI-generated installation from its collection, showcase the integration of AI in the creative sphere. However, the UK Court of Appeal ruled in 2021 that an artificial intelligence system cannot be named as an inventor on a patent application.
A significant case emerged with Dr. Stephen Thaler's appeal, seeking to patent inventions allegedly derived from an AI machine named 'DABUS.' The UK Supreme Court engaged in a landmark patent case on March 2, 2023, grappling with the question of whether an AI entity can be recognised as an inventor.
Implications of the Supreme Court Decision
The Supreme Court's impending decision is poised to have profound implications for the future of innovation and intellectual property law. As the legal landscape grapples with the intersection of AI and patentability, the outcome of this case will likely shape the trajectory of patent law in the context of AI-generated works. The decision is eagerly awaited, promising to provide clarity on the evolving dynamics between AI, inventiveness, and patent ownership.
Comentarios