The whirlwind development and widespread adoption of new AI technologies have brought in a new era of unprecedented innovation. However, with all new innovations complex legal issues arise that present both a challenge and an opportunity in the field of intellectual property rights. AI companies must be careful when using copyrighted works to train these emerging AI models as there are far reaching implications on copyright law, fair use and AI-generated specific issues. In the same vein, users of AI-generated technologies should be aware of the ownership or copyright rights that are associated with the input or the output generated by the AI system - it is crucial to always review the Terms of Use when using these AI softwares.
Whilst AI innovations could have the potential to disrupt the traditional legal system and other prominent sectors, the primary challenge in the AI sector is the potential of AI-generated works to potentially infringe on copyrighted or patented materials. This could lead to violating intellectual property law and potentially being open to a suit from original creators or intellectual property rights holders.
Fair Use Considerations
In the context of these AI-generated or assisted works, the principle of “fair use” has become a contentious point of discussion. Companies such as OpenAI and StabilityAI have often asserted that the fair use principle protects them and allows them to train their AI systems on licensed content. However, the applicability of this within the AI-generated content is still largely untested.
However, what constitutes fair use in AI depends on whether the AI-generated works are considered to be ‘transformative’ - meaning that they differ significantly from the original content. Previous precedent has been set in the Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc., 593 U.S. court decision which outlined that using collected data to create new works can be transformative. In Google v Oracle, Google was using portions of Java SE code to develop its own Android operating system and the court deemed this to be a correct application of fair use.
The United Kingdom, for example, is currently working on amending the existing legal framework to permit data and text mining “for any purpose”, which can be argued is shifting the balance of power away from intellectual property rights holders and more towards businesses and commercial entities. This change of direction reflects the evolving legal landscape of AI-related issues but also highlights a dire need for a nuanced approach to copyright in the new era of AI.
AI technologies resent both drawbacks and benefits from an intellectual property standpoint. The new emerging AI technologies help to foster innovation and creativity but it also raises serious questions about copyright infringement and fair use. As these technologies emerge and become a part of daily life, it is essential for lawmakers, legal experts and businesses to adapt and work towards finding a solution that strikes a fair balance between encouraging these technologies and upholding intellectual property rights in this rapidly changing landscape.
Comments