top of page

Case Analysis: Vegap v. Mango 2024



A Landmark Copyright Ruling Where A Barcelona Court Upholds Mango's NFT Art Exhibition in Metaverse


In a groundbreaking copyright dispute, a Commercial Court in Barcelona recently handed down a verdict favouring the fashion retailer Mango over the Spanish collective society for artists VEGAP. The case revolved around the adaptation of renowned Spanish artists' works into garments showcased on the Metaverse platform, culminating in the court ruling in favor of Mango. 


Background:

The dispute goes back to March 2022 when Mango announced its intention to exhibit a series of unique works by artist Farkas in a virtual museum located in Decentraland. These works were reinterpretations of pieces by prominent Spanish artists such as Joan Miró, Antoni Tàpies, and Miquel Barceló. While Mango possessed the physical artworks, it ventured into creating digital adaptations and minting NFTs based on these works without explicit permission from VEGAP.


VEGAP, representing Spanish artists, alleged copyright infringement on the grounds that Mango's actions violated artists' exclusive moral and economic rights. The legal battle took an intriguing turn when the court issued an injunction requesting the depositing of alleged offending NFTs, which was later withdrawn due to technical complexities.


The crux of the dispute rested on the distinction between physical and intellectual property rights, particularly concerning the adaptation of artworks into digital formats. The court examined whether Mango's transformation of the artworks constituted unauthorized adaptation, which is an exclusive right of the copyright owner. Despite Spain lacking a fair use system, the court invoked the concept of "harmless use" to assess Mango's actions against copyright laws.


Verdict:

In a meticulously argued decision, the Barcelona court ruled that Mango's digital adaptations and exhibition of NFTs did not infringe upon copyright laws. It deemed Mango's use as fair, lawful, and harmless, enhancing the visibility of the artworks without causing prejudice to the artists or their successors. The court recognised Mango's right to exhibit purchased paintings without explicit authorisation from the original creators.


The ruling sets a significant precedent in the evolving landscape of copyright law, particularly in the context of digital transformations and NFTs. It underscores the importance of balancing intellectual property rights with technological advancements, paving the way for further exploration and innovation in the creative sphere.


In a separate but related development, Barcelona's Mercantile Court No. 9 upheld Mango's position in a lawsuit concerning NFT art inspired by works of Catalan artists. The court's decision reaffirms Mango's right to engage in digital transformations and virtual exhibitions without infringing upon artists' copyright.


The rulings from Barcelona's Commercial Court signify a watershed moment in the intersection of copyright law and digital innovation. They highlight the need for nuanced legal interpretations to address evolving challenges in the digital realm while safeguarding creators' rights. As technology continues to reshape creative landscapes, legal frameworks must adapt to foster innovation while upholding intellectual property rights.








Kommentare


bottom of page